Research Article

Role Based Multi-Agent Reasoning Frameworks

by  Isaiah Nwukor
journal cover
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 187 - Issue 78
Published: February 2026
Authors: Isaiah Nwukor
10.5120/ijca2026926337
PDF

Isaiah Nwukor . Role Based Multi-Agent Reasoning Frameworks. International Journal of Computer Applications. 187, 78 (February 2026), 50-62. DOI=10.5120/ijca2026926337

                        @article{ 10.5120/ijca2026926337,
                        author  = { Isaiah Nwukor },
                        title   = { Role Based Multi-Agent Reasoning Frameworks },
                        journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
                        year    = { 2026 },
                        volume  = { 187 },
                        number  = { 78 },
                        pages   = { 50-62 },
                        doi     = { 10.5120/ijca2026926337 },
                        publisher = { Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA }
                        }
                        %0 Journal Article
                        %D 2026
                        %A Isaiah Nwukor
                        %T Role Based Multi-Agent Reasoning Frameworks%T 
                        %J International Journal of Computer Applications
                        %V 187
                        %N 78
                        %P 50-62
                        %R 10.5120/ijca2026926337
                        %I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Individual artificial intelligence systems face an inherent trade-off between plasticity and stability under resource constraints. I propose that general intelligence emerges from networks of specialized agents applying a structured reasoning cycle to answer four fundamental questions. Agents ground abstract patterns through affective valence embeddings and coordinate via a shared database of credibility-weighted knowledge packages. I formalize a five-stage reasoning engine (Salience Detection → Hypothesis Generation → Experimentation → Structural Correspondence → Generalization) where agents at different stages specialize in different questions, enabling zero-shot cross-domain transfer. Using ARC-AGI task "as66" as demonstration, I show 276 generations of evolutionary learning where complementary specialization yields a current maximum of Level 4 performance across agents [20]. This framework provides testable predictions for performance scaling, transfer capability, and behavioral signatures of reasoning integration.

References
  • Kirkwood, T. B. L., & Rose, M. R. (1991). Evolution of senescence. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 332(1262), 15-24.
  • Hensch, T. K. (2004). Critical period regulation. Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 27, 549-579.
  • McCloskey, M., & Cohen, N. J. (1989). Catastrophic interference in connectionist networks. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 24, 109-165.
  • Foerster, J., et al. (2016). Learning to communicate with deep multi-agent reinforcement learning. NeurIPS.
  • Zoph, B., & Le, Q. V. (2017). Neural architecture search with reinforcement learning. ICLR.
  • Rusu, A. A., et al. (2016). Progressive neural networks. arXiv:1606.04671.
  • Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1995). Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought. MIT Press.
  • Ochman, H., Lawrence, J. G., & Groisman, E. A. (2000). Lateral gene transfer and bacterial innovation. Nature, 405(6784), 299-304.
  • Tononi, G., et al. (2016). Integrated information theory: from consciousness to its physical substrate. Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 17(7), 450-461.
  • Baars, B. J. (1988). A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
  • Chollet, F. (2019). On the measure of intelligence. arXiv:1911.01547.
  • Amdahl, G. M. (1967). Validity of the single processor approach to large scale computing. AFIPS Conf. Proc., 30, 483-485.
  • Nii, H. P. (1986). Blackboard systems. AI Magazine, 7(2), 38-53.
  • Forterre, P. (2006). Three RNA cells for ribosomal lineages and three DNA viruses. PNAS, 103(10), 3669-3674.
  • Amdahl's coordination overhead principle applied to distributed agent systems.
  • Woese, C. R. (2002). On the evolution of cells. PNAS, 99(13), 8742-8747.
  • Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behav. Brain Sci., 36(3), 181-204.
  • Rissanen, J. (1978). Modeling by shortest data description. Automatica, 14(5), 465-471.
  • Plotkin, G. D. (1970). A note on inductive generalization. Machine Intelligence, 5, 153-163.
  • Ouroboros ARC-AGI Implementation. (2025). Game replay: as66-821a4dcad9c2. Available: https://three.arcprize.org/replay/as66-821a4dcad9c2/55d279d1-3f1e-416f-9024-c49e1b1df573
  • ARC Prize. ARC-AGI Live Leaderboards. Available: https://three.arcprize.org/leaderboard. Accessed January 2026
Index Terms
Computer Science
Information Sciences
No index terms available.
Keywords

Multi-agent reinforcement learning Distributed reasoning Cross-domain transfer learning Knowledge integration Zero-shot learning Role-based learning ARC-AGI benchmark Artificial intelligence Continual learning.

Powered by PhDFocusTM